Ver mensaje
  #11  
Antiguo 24-10-2010, 20:56
Avatar de Cedemont
Cedemont Cedemont esta desconectado
Hermano de la costa
 
Registrado: 09-06-2009
Localización: Atlantico y Mediterraneo
Edad: 61
Mensajes: 3,113
Agradecimientos que ha otorgado: 366
Recibió 1,312 Agradecimientos en 611 Mensajes
Sexo:
Predeterminado Re: Veleros que aguantan el mal tiempo y los que nunca lo haran

Cita:
Originalmente publicado por porcorosso Ver mensaje
Hola cofrade GermanR, mira lo que aconseja Jimmy Cornell a una persona en un viaje por los 40s.
My wife and I are in the process of selling our Nicholson 32 and are contemplating buying a second hand Ovni 385 for a trip to Antartica and Svalbard. I have been searching without success to find accounts of shallow draft centerboard boats in extreme weather conditions, and someone told me that you took an Ovni to Antarctica. Also what about the OVNI's sea-keeping abilities, her comfort levels at sea and her ability to deal with an ugly sea. I don't imagine she will be as forgiving and comfortable as our Nic32, but how much worse I wonder? If you had the freedom to choose another boat, would you still take your OVNI down South again? What were her shortfalls at sea? and what did she do better?Yes, I did take my OVNI 43 to Antarctica and also sailed on a friend's OVNI 39 to Spitsbergen. I have confidence in the OVNI design BUT when it comes to stability.... it is not just the stability of the boat that counts if it may come to extreme weather and the possibility of capsizing, but also the experience of the crew and skipper. So while I was quite happy to take my own OVNI into the Southern Ocean (and had an experienced crew) I would be reluctant to recommend to anyone to take a light displacement centreboarder into that area. The OVNI is OK for ANY job, but a lot depends on who is in charge!
I just completed a circumnavigation on my OVNI 43 and I can assure you that the boat is as comfortable as a heavier boat. Your concern, about how an OVNI handles in heavy weather is understandable. I have been in winds 60+ knots (briefly) and sustained 40 knot winds, without any problem, but I continued sailing - because this is what you do in a light or medium/light displacement boat. Also, I hove to in 35 knots and while she made more leeway than a keeled boat, she behaved reasonably well and was very stable.
If you only plan to go around Cape Horn, I feel a 385 would be fine...if you plan to sail all the way to New Zealand in the 40s and 50s, then I go back to the beginning of this message: it's not up to the boat, it's up to you! I know what I can do, and I would take my boat along that route.

Cofrade Cedemont aunque a ti no te gustan los Alubat son de los pocos barcos de serie que frecuentan los lugares mas inhospitos y dificiles del planeta.
Que no te sepa mal que no es mi intencion, pero si pusiesemos tu barco que tiene un muy buen STIX al lado de un Ovni en Canarias con un cartel con el numero de STIX pegado en cada popa y dieramos a escoger a los transmundistas con muchas millas y criterio entre los 2 estoy seguro que la mayoria escojeria el Ovni a pesar de tener al menos 20 puntos menos de STIX. Un saludo y unas
Mi barco no le llega a un OVNI ni a la suela del zapato en relacion a solidez del casco, es bastante inferior a el. Fijate lo rapido que lo reconozco, y no hacerlo seria idiota por mi parte.

Ahora, yo tambien he estado con el mio en 60 nudos llevando trinqueta y te aseguro que nunca tuve el menor problema, no se si sera por el STIX, por la trinqueta,por la mula francis o lo que tu quieras, pero iba muy muy seguro.

Simplemente he dicho y lo mantengo que me gustan mas los diseños de Ted Brewer o VDST para el aluminio o el acero que los de otro, incluido Holland,Finot,Farr

Copitas
__________________
Cedemont

El hilo del STIX,"Veleros que aguantan el mal tiempo y los que nunca lo harán"
Los siguientes cofrades agradecieron este mensaje a Cedemont
porcorosso (24-10-2010)